Friday, March 31, 2006

Keep On Remembering

Today’s lesson continues studies in Luke. In Chapter 22, we see three very much related events: The Lord’s Supper followed by the Disciples’ not getting it at all and arguing over who would be the greatest. This is followed by Peter’s statement of how faithful he would be for Jesus and Jesus reminding him that Satan want him and that he in fact, would fall three before “the cock crows.” We’ll see later why these are so interrelated.

The Supper Is More Than a Ritual (Luke 22:14-20). See [da Vinci’s Famous “Last Supper]

Communion, Lord's Supper, and Eucharist: All are traditional names for the observance commemorating Jesus' death. Baptists believe that there are two “ordinances” because, while other churches honor more, we traditionally find that only two are mentioned in the Bible: Baptism and the Lord’s Supper. We refer to these acts as “ordinances” because they were “ordained” by Christ, Himself. See Matthew 28:19; 1 Corinthians 11:24,25. Those churches that believe these to be “sacraments” believe that their observance confers grace upon those who observe it. We see them, rather as symbols, powerful symbols, but symbols nonetheless.


There are two different names, which are often used to identify the Lord’s Supper. Some refer it as the “Eucharist” -- which means, “to give thanks”. Before Christ broke the bread, He gave thanks. (This established another tradition of remembrance.) It also means that we are “giving thanks” to God for sending His Son to pay the price for our sins.

Some churches call it “Communion”. This is our English translation of the NT Greek word, koinonia, which means, “fellowship or having things in common, hence our “fellowship suppers.” What we call it is not as important as why we observe it. When He instituted the “Lord’s Supper,” that night, Christ taught His disciples and by extension, us a number of things. Nevertheless, the concept of “communion” runs through the whole of Luke Chapter 22.

Together. What they did, they did together, and it was all in common. Luke 22:14. They were a family. So must we be. We need to remember that because without Christ we have no rudder and without each other, we have no oars. A racing boat without a rudder and oars is not only directionless but it is also powerless. If that describes us, then we are destined to be like Wagner’s “Flying Dutchman” who was condemned to sail the seas forever and never be able to come to port.

Earnest Desire for Us. Christ says in v.15 that he “earnestly desired” to share this with them. A literal translation of the word is “lusted.” “Of course today, “lust” has a very singular and negative connotation, but it nevertheless, describes God’s desire for us and our fellowship. It is the prime reason for His creation of man, in my opinion. Thus, His love for us is a consuming passion. Ours for Him should be reciprocal. Likewise, our passion ( and here I won’t use “lust”) for each other is that each of us comes into that fellowship with Him.

“Broken and Spilled Out.” We all know that the bread and the wine represent His body and blood, “broken and spilled out,” in the words of the Gaithers. But note in v. 17 that these two extremely powerful symbols are to be likewise “given” to be shared by the group [us.] Yet another reaffirmation of His message that we are all in this together – Peter, James, John and you, me and Christ.

[Matt Cooper’s “Spilled Wine”]

“Remember Me, I’m the One Who Loves You.” By comparison, the Dean Martin song is trite compared to the love of Christ. But the messages ring harmoniously.

Christ says that when we reenact the Lord’s Supper, we join again into the koinonia that empowers us to live our daily lives. More so though, continual remembrance of Him and His sacrifice sets us streaking through the rough waters like the team members of the famous Cambridge and Oxford Boat racers pictured below.



Greatness Comes Through Serving (Luke 22:24-27)
But alas, the Disciples didn’t get it. While the symbolism of His act had meaning to them, they soon forgot it. Can you imagine that – they forgot what Christ had just taught them about being all in this together. We would never do that would we – would we? Ten minutes and three verses later (v.27,) Luke [who wasn’t there, remember] tells us that they devolve into a discussion of exactly who would have the highest office in the new kingdom.

There are three points they missed here. First, there wasn’t going to be a kingdom like they thought – it would be vastly differently – a kingdom of the heart, not a kingdom of the body. He told them that, but it seemed to pass by some how. It’s easy to “not get it” when you don’t want to get it, isn’t it?

Secondly, even if there were going to be some earthly kingdom [which there wasn’t] there would be no greater and lesser people. It takes Peter until Acts 10 to figure out that “God us no respecter of persons.” Paul echoes, “All have sinned. . .” There is no first or last. We are brothers and sisters with God as our Father.

Lastly, assuming arguendo that there would be an Earthly kingdom and that there would be “firsts” and “not firsts” in authority, we still are bound together in that common koinonia, the fellowship of us all – and we are back in the canoe without a paddle. That is what Christ said to remember. All those things, but the fellowship overarching it all.

Satan Wants You to Fail (Luke 22:31-34).
Is it possible for us to remember in the words of the Shema to “love God” and with Jesus’ addition, to “love our neighbor as ourselves?” That is to say, can we in our own strength live in the fellowship that is required to experience the life God has for us? What do you think? Peter tells us that Satan is a “roaring lion” on the prowl just waiting for us to try to do this in our own strength. When we do [note: when not if] we will invariably deny Christ at least three times before the cock crows. And when we hear the cock crowing, Satan will point out our failure just to rub it in. This failure breaks the fellowship, not only with God but with man as well.

[Carl Bloch’s “Peter’s Denial”]

Now for the Good News. The Good News is that Christ intends for this fellowship to be unbroken and He stands more than “ready, willing and able,” rather He stands “lusting,” if I may use that word here, to restore us to fellowship as He did Peter by the Sea of Galilee. And this is something would should remember, too.

So, when we take the Lord’s Supper, Communion, we have a lot to think about, but like so many things Christ has commanded us, that “thinking about” is for our own benefit. Let’s challenge each other to take a fresh look at the Lord’s Supper and remember . . .

Friday, March 24, 2006

Honoring Christ

Today’s lesson, which takes place as Jesus is beginning His final foray into the Holy City, even with its grand-scale events even by modern standards, never the less yields three points that appear small, but in actuality are as grand as the scale of Jesus triumphal display for in them we see the microcosm of Jesus gospel.

Once, Jesus was tested by a Pharisee (Matt. 22:37) who asked, “what is the greatest Commandment?” As we all remember, Jesus replied by quoting the Shema (Deut. 6:5) known and recited by all Jews every day, “thou shalt love the Lord, thy God with all thy heart and all thy soul and all thy strength.” But He adds to it, “. . . and thy neighbor as thyself.” He states that on these two, hand “all the Law and the Prophets,” IE. the totality of God’s commandments.


These two principles run through today’s lesson, which if followed lead to Jesus’ promised “abundant life.”

  • We honor Christ as Lord by Obeying His Word. Luke 19:28-32.
  • We honor Christ as King by praise. Vv. 35-40.
  • We honor Christ by loving our fellow man. Vv. 41-44.

Honor Christ as Lord by obeying His Word. In the passage, Jesus tells certain unnamed disciples to go “over yonder” to the village and get the colt of a donkey and if asked, they are to say, “the Master has need of this.” Two questions come to mind: which village and was this planned in advance or did Jesus, with Godly omniscience just know the donkey was there?

The text of Luke doesn’t really answer either question for us. However, Matthew, recording the same incident says that they were going between Bethphage and Bethany and that they were to go into Bethphage to get to donkey. OK, what’s up with this? Bethany was a small village on the southeastern slope of the Mount of Olives, less than two miles from Jerusalem. It is on the road from Jericho from where Jesus started this trip to Jerusalem, where He will end it. Bethany is a significant little village.

See the following from: Andersen, H.G. "Bethany" The Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia of the Bible. Ed. Merrill C. Tenney. 5 vols. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1976; Gregory, Stewart. Israel, the Holy Land: The Concise Biblical Study & Travel Guide. Jerusalem: Bibleland Workshops, 1987; and Rousseau, John J. and Rami Arav. Jesus and His World: An Archaeological and Cultural Dictionary. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1995.

Scholars tell us:

Bethany was the home of Jesus’ special friends, Martha, Mary and Lazarus. Apparently, He and His disciples often visited in their home, probably when they came to Jerusalem for feast days. It is there where Jesus tells Martha, “Martha, Martha (indicating their close friendship), you are worried and bothered about so many things; but only a few things are necessary, really only one: for Mary has chosen the good part, which shall not be taken away from her" (Luke 10:39-42). This is the same Bethany where Lazarus is raised from the dead. (John 11:47-51). It was this event that confirmed and accelerated the Sanhedrin’s plan to put Jesus to death (John 11:45-54).

On another occasion, a week before the crucifixion, Mary anointed Jesus’ feet in the home of Simon the leper in Bethany (Matt 26:6-13; Mark 14:3-9; John 12:2-11). When it became known that Jesus was in Bethany, a "great multitude" came to the village, not only to see Jesus who had raised Lazarus, but also to see Lazarus himself who was, no doubt, the object of much speculation and wonder! This flow of people to Bethany, and the increasing numbers of them who, as result of this sign miracle, believed in Jesus, incensed the religious leaders in Jerusalem. So violent was their reaction that they "took counsel that they might put Lazarus to death also" (John 12:9-11). Again, it was the proximity of Bethany to Jerusalem that accentuated this climaxing confrontation between the Sanhedrin and Jesus.

On the Sunday before the Friday of His crucifixion, Jesus made His formal entrance into Jerusalem, apparently starting at Bethany. Passing near Bethphage, an adjacent village on the Mount of Olives, He requisitioned a donkey for His prophecy-fulfilling approach to the city (Zech 9:9; Matt 21:1-11; Mark 11:1-11; Luke 19:29-44; John 12:12-19.

After His official entry into Jerusalem (the "triumphal entry"), Jesus returned to Bethany with His disciples (Matt 21:17; Mark 11:11,12).

Finally, when Jesus was about to return to His Father from the Mount of Olives, "He led them out as far as Bethany, and He lifted up His hands and blessed them. And it came about, that while He was blessing them, He departed from them" (Luke 24:50,52). This home in Bethany, so often opened to Jesus, now became the place from which He would leave the earth to return to His Father’s "home


Bethphage is only about a mile from Bethany and less than a mile from Jerusalem. While some will assert that Jesus used some miraculous power to acquire the donkey, I choose to follow “Occam’s Razor” which is a principle that states, in essence that given the choice between two competing answers, “the simplest answer is the best.” The simplest answer is that Jesus had some unnamed co-conspirator in the Bethany-Bethphage area with whom He had a pre-arrangement for the donkey with the password being, “the Master is in need of it.” It could be that this unnamed disciple and “co-conspirator” knew much of Jesus plan to enter the city as the Messiah. What an honor for that person to be “in on” Jesus’ great plan!

Be all that scholarly stuff as it may, the most important point is that He told the disciples to do it and they, though obviously not “in on the plan” did it. They could have asked, “why,” but they didn’t. That’s the lesson for us. God has plans, big plans, plans for the world and plans for us. Sometimes He takes us into His confidence and some sometimes He takes other people into His confidence. Sometimes, He takes no one into his confidence. The blessing, though is being in on the execution.

Oh, a small point on this – these disciples knew what Jesus was telling them because they heard it from His lips. We don’t have that privilege any more. What are we to do? We have the broader scope of hearing from God through the Holy Spirit unlimited by our ears and eyes. Henry Blackaby tells us that God speaks to us, “through the Holy Spirit by the Bible, prayer, circumstance and the Church to reveal Himself, His purposes and His ways.” All we have to do is hone our listening skills and listen for the Word – then do it and be blessed.

We honor Christ as King by praising Him. As alluded to in the previous section, Jesus was planning a triumphal assault on Jerusalem. He had over three years revealed more and more of “Himself, His purposes and His ways” to the people, first hinting and now finally stating clearly and openly that He is the Messiah, the promised one, the God in Man.

He gives them increasing and now final opportunity to accept that – but they refuse. In aid of that plan, he uses a time-honored technique of the prophets. When the people would not heard the mere words, the prophet, under God’s leadership, would do some dramatic act to get their attention. Remember, Hosea marrying the harlot and Jeremiah breaking the bowls in the Valley of Hinnon and wearing the stocks? Likewise, Jesus fulfills, in intricate detail and clearly by design, the prophesies about the Messiah – in this case the triumphal entry foretold in Zachariah, supra.

Here, Jesus proclaims Himself “King of the Jews.” The disciples respond appropriately by spreading the cloaks on His saddle and on the path ahead of Him (remember Sir Walter Raleigh, where do you think he got that poetic idea?) In so doing, they proclaim Him as king. To do so, is not merely to partake of a display, to acknowledge a king, one must recognize that He is greater than you are. It is that recognition of His greatness, IE. praise, that is vital to our ability to follow his instructions without question. We must “lose ourselves” in His greatness. To the extent that we are able to do that, we can receive the blessing of the promised “abundant life.”

We honor Christ by loving our fellow man. On the way in, Jesus stops and weeps over Jerusalem. We see here a clear picture of how God feels when we disobey Him. This is not because He is offended or has hurt feelings, this is because he knows how much suffering and disappointment we will bring on ourselves by our disobedience and He is sad about that. Thus, in Matthew’s simple but poignant words, “Jesus wept.”

Jesus said that if we truly love God, we will love our fellow man. I would submit that one who does not love his fellow man does not really love God. If that is the case, then we are back at the beginning which is that if you don’t do what He says, you don’t love Him. And if you don’t love Him, you rob yourself of the blessing that He promised –abundant life. To illustrate the point, I close this piece with one of my favorite poems: “Abu Ben Adam” by James Leigh Hunt.

Abu Ben Adam, may his tribe increase, Awoke one night from a deep dream of peace.
And saw, within the moonlight of his room Making it rich, like a lily in bloom,
An angel writing in a book of gold. Exceeding peace had made Abu Ben Adam bold
And to the presence in his room he said, ' What writest thou?' The vision raised its head, And with a look of all sweet accord Answered: 'The names of those who love the Lord. 'And is mine one?' said Abu. 'Nay not so' Replied the Angel. Abu spoke more low, But cheerily still and said, 'I pray thee then Write me as one that loves his fellow-men.'
The angel wrote and vanished.
The next night it came again with awaking light, And showed the names of whom love of God had blessed. And lo! Ben Adam's name led all the rest.

Friday, March 17, 2006

Celebrating Forgiveness

T his week's lesson continues the study in Luke, Luke 15:1-32 (with some deletions.) Last week, Jesus was teaching us about prayer. This week about compassion, forgiveness and self-righteousness. In last week's note, we looked at a little about the Book of Luke; this week, a little more detail about the book will help enlighten the words.

The great Dispensationalist, Dr. Charles Caldwell Ryrie, Chairman of the Department of Systematic Theology at Dallas Seminary outlines Luke for us. The mere outline is quite instructive because it lays out where Luke believes Jesus was going with His life, ministry and mission. Ryrie tells us that Luke's theme is to show the humanity of Jesus, the Son of Man. As I stated last week, Luke's interest in the human may well be related to his caring nature as a physician, the Beloved Physician, and to his artistic nature.

Ryrie outlines the Book, in para materia:
1.Method and Purpose of the Book
2.The Identification of the Son of Man with Men (1:5 - 4:13)
3.The ministry of the Son of Man to Men (4:14 - 9:50)
4.The Repudiation of the Son of Man by Men (9:1 - 19:27)
5.The Condemnation of the Son of Man by Men (19:28 - 23:56)
6.The vindication of the Son of Man before Men (24:1-53.)

Today's session is right in the middle of Section 4, the Repudiation. In this section, we see Jesus systematically rejected by various groups including the Scribes and the Pharisees. Then we come to a subset of Dr. Ryrie's outline at 12:1 - 19:27, entitled: "Instruction in light of rejection," ie. how the followers should behave while being rejected. In this subsection are found Jesus teachings, sometimes via parables, on hypocracy, covetousness, faithfulness, repentance, hypocracy (again,) forgiveness and several others.Luke tells us that Jesus was the Son of God, but also a man: that He ministered to men but was rejected by the very men to whom He ministered, rejected unto death; but that ultimately He andHis Message are vindicated as He arises from the grave as He said He would do.

Throughout the repudiation period, the leaders of the repudiation were the leaders of the Jewish people, the Scribes and the Pharasees.The Scribes were a professional class of men, a learned group schooled in the Law of Moses, the Torah and the Talmud, which amounted to the "regs." as we bureaucrats would say, developed during the period of the Babylonian captivity in the Fifth Century B.C. It was their job to know the law, every *"jot" and "tittle," and to interpret it strictly. They worked closely with the priests and thus exercised great political authority over the people.

Likewise the Pharisees had great sway over the people. They were a group that began to develop in the captivity but grew afterwards. They started as men who wanted to, themselves, live holy and pleasing lives before God; a noble ideal - but it went awry when many became so self-absorbed with their own righteousness, that they lost the concept totally. The were the "Democrats" to the Scribes' "Republicans." The two groups didn't agree on much, especially theology which is why their union against Jesus was so interesting.

Jesus loathed the practices of both these groups and He was most critical of them both. He decried their control of people's lives and self-centered nature. What He disliked most was that these two groups were leading the People of God astray. "Blind guides," He called them, "you lead the people into the ditch with you!" "Woe to you, lawyers (scribes,) hypocrites!"One school of though concerning Jesus' ministry is that as He observed these things, He purposefully set out to lead the people away from their teachings and leadership. Many others had tried, and all failed. Thus, so this school of thought has it, Jesus set out in calculated manner to take on these two groups until their own evil ultimately manifested against Him would be their own undoing. If that is so, then his comments against the Scribes and Pharasees were designed to lead them to the conclusion to which they reach about Him and thus seal His death. In death, He knew that God would overcome their evil as He conquered death, Hell, the grave and the leadership of "blind guides."

These two groups figure in today's lesson - in the background, but they are there. Today shows us two of three parables Jesus taught in this passage which illustrated the lostness of the common man, the love of God and the hypocracy of these leaders. The deleted parable is that of the "Lost Coin." Of this trilogy, Barclay says that there is no more loved chapter in the Bible. He calls it the "Gospel of the Gospel." These parables arise, as Barclay says, out of a real life situation that was unique to Jewish culture - the dichotomy of the "sinner" and the "righteous" as they defined sin and righteousness. We have already discussed the orthodoxy of the Scribes and Pharisees, but now we look at the "sinners." Don't think here in terms of what we in the 21st Century might call sinners, that is to say, people who do evil deed, criminal or immoral persons. No, to the "righteous" Jew, "sinners" were "the people of the land," the unorthodox. The Talmud (remember, the "regs.) held that if you wanted to righteous, there must always exist a separatin between the righteous and the "people of the land." There should be no socialization, no conversation, if possible no business dealings. There was a deliberate teaching to avoid those people at all costs. And who were those people? Their "sin" was not keeping the "regs." It is true that numbered among the sinners were the criminals and immoral, but those men existed among the so-called righteous as well. These were as a group, the people who were excluded from the temple because they were sick or lame or blind or in some way ceremonial impure. Further, many occupations by their nature rendered one a "sinner" because they were unable to keep the laws. For example - shepherds.

1. Show Compassion - The Parable of the Lost Sheep . Luke 15:1-7."Shepherd" brings us to that first story in vv. 1-7. In this story, Jesus makes the shepherd to be the hero of the story. That alone would irritate a good Pharisee. Jesus makes the point more so by being the "Good Shepherd," a phrase that would be an oxymoron to a Scribe. Of course, Jesus, the "Good Shepherd" is the shepherd of the story. Through His bravery and courage, he seeks out at personal cost and finds even one sheep (sinner) that is lost. The picture of a communal herd of sheep, owned by several people perhaps shepherded by more than one shepherd. At the close of the day, the sheep are rounded up to take to the sheep-fold to keep them safe at night from predators - lions and bears (both of which David encountered and killed.) At the head count, one is missing. The Good Shepherd tells the other to drive the sheep home and he will find the lost one. As the other shepherd comes into the village, he would tell the people that there was straggler and his buddy was out looking for it. The people of the village would have been interested in this and would be waiting to see what would happen.

Then we see the picture of the brave shepherd striding over the hills with the sheep on his shoulders, bringing him home to the shelter of the fold. Why on his shoulders? That's the way you carry sheep at a distance - it's easier that way. The people would see this and all be relieved that the one lost is found. It is likewise a cause for applause in Heaven when one of us real-life sinners is brought home, saved from the "roaring lion" by the Good Shepherd.Jesus summarization of the point of the story has a "barb" in it. In the story, the lost sheep is a sinner, but the good sheep are the "righteous" who "have no need of repentance." The point is that there is no such person! "All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God," says Paul. Thus hidden in the story of the love of the Good Shephered is the kernel of the self-rightousness that will grow and blossom in the final story of the trilogy.

2. Celebrate Forgiveness. Luke 15:11-13, 22-24.
As we said earlier, we are skipping over the parable of the lost coin. However, we should point out that the parable teaches us that while there is joy in Heaven when a "sinner" is brought home, God Himself is jubilant. It is important to note from this the depth of feeling that God has for us - each of us. And like all of us who have loved and lost, God knows to intense feeling of having tlinegiven Himself, His very life, for the sinner, that sinner ultimately choose to repudiate Him. Jesus is sending that message to the Scribes and Pharisees as well - their rejection of Him is a rejection of God, a rejection that breaks the heart of God.

This would have come as a shock to His audience who would not have historically pictured God in that manner.The theme is carried on in the parable commonly called the Prodical Son. Barclay urges that it should rather be called "The Loving Father," as it is all about the love of the Father. This, likewise is a Bible story known and loved by most people, Christian or not. The point for our purposes is that God, Himself loves us enough to allow us to go off and "seek our fortune", giving us , as it were, an advance on our inheritance.

Under the Mosaic Law (Deut.21:17), since the oldest son must receive 2/3 of the estate after the death of the father, the younger would be entitled to 1/3 - entitled after the death of the father.Knowing that we will fail, but knowing that we must choose to come back to Him to really love Him, He all the more rejoices when the prodical returns to the extent in the opposite direction He has grieved when the Prodical was lost. Who is the prodical? Of course he is you and me. Each of us seeks our own self-satisfaction and we go our own way seeking our own way. What's the result? Ending up in the pig pen. The only way out is to humble ourselves by realizing that we cannot save ourselves and turn our lives over to this Loving Father to do with us as He will. And what is His will - that we be a hired hand? No, from the parable we see that God receives as a son. He puts a ring on our finger, a robe on our shoulders and shoes on our feet. Yes there is joy in Heaven when one lost one returns - all the more so, there is joy in the heart of the Loving Father. Lincoln was asked how he would treat the rebellious Southerners after the war. Of course vengeance would be in the mind of most. However, Lincoln replied, "I would treat them as if they had never left." In fact, after the surrender of Lee at Appomattox Court House in April of 1865, rather than calling for a great victory ball with appropriate dance music, Lincoln asked the Marine Band, crimson jackets and all to play the song, "Dixie" as a lament for all those who were lost.

3. Reject Self-Righteousness . Luke 15: 28-32.
There is a dark ending to this story. In the background lurk the Scribes and Pharisees who are not jubilant when a sinner comes home. This defies their tradition and thus upsets their theology. That made them uneasy at heart. Perhaps more importantly, it threatened them, their power and their position. This was a point not lost on Jesus when He puts them in the story as the "Other Brother." Jesus pictures this brother as brooding, having fulfilled the Law - every *jot and tittle but wanting complete control. In short, they were selfish and self-righteous. It is this self-righteousness that was perhaps their greatest sin because it keep them separated from God. If your heart is full of you, there is no room for God. The old preacher once said, "you can't get a man saved until you get him lost." In his mind, that is. The Scribes and Pharisees did not know they were lost. That ignorance would separate them eternally from God. Worse for the people, they led the great "unwashed masses" to believe that lie.
Jesus' great point in this is not only that self-rightousness is abhorrent to God, but it does in fact lead us to our own destruction. You see, despite what the Scribes and Pharisees taught, none of us is the other brother, the joyful villager, the "righteous." We are , rather the lost sheep, the lost son and the lost coin - lost. Only when we allow Jesus to find us and carry us back to the Father on His broad Good Shepherd shoulders are we able to accept the "robe and the crown" given to the returning prodical son.Revelation tells us what we ultimately will do what that robe and crown. We will not wear them proudly in Heaven on our chest like the battle ribbons of the brave soldier no, we will "lay them at the feet of Jesus." Only He is worthy to receive them.

End note: "Jot and tittle. These are elements of characters in the Hebrew alphabet. The jot is the little curl mark at the corner of the character and the tittle is the straight line across some characters. They would equate to a dot on the "I" and the cross on the "t."

Saturday, March 11, 2006

Keep On Praying


When I played football for the Brantley High Bulldogs, we always huddled up before each game and said the Lord’s Prayer. Then we went out to kill our opponent – or at least do as much serious bodily harm as we could. We recited that prayer because our coach, Coach Orville Eubanks was a good Methodist and a man of prayer.

Well, what is it that prayer that is so special? What makes it better than the Prayer of Moses or the prayers of David or the “Prayer of Jabez?” The answer is that it came from Jesus, Himself, thus from the mouth of God to our ears! Perhaps we ought to hear it.

The version in today’s lesson of the Model Prayer or “Lord’s Prayer” is taken from Luke 11. Luke gives us a shortened version of the longer prayer that Jesus prays in Matthew 5 as a part of the Sermon on the Mount. The famous prayer is also known as the Paternoster, the “Our Father.” As recited, it would be

Pater noster,¨ qui es in caelis,¨ sanctificetur nomen tuum:¨ adveniat regnum tuum:¨ fiat voluntas tua, sicut in caelo, et in terra.¨ Panem nostrum quotidianum da nobis hodie:¨et dimitte nobis debita nostra,¨ sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris.¨Et ne nos inducas in tentationem:¨ sed libera nos a malo. Amen.

But before concentrating of the Prayer, let’s look briefly at Luke, the book. While Matthew was one of the Twelve and wrote his book addressed to the Jews, Luke was Gentile, in fact the only Gentile privileged to be included as a writer of the New Testament. Tradition has it that Luke, who as we all know was a doctor, was also a skilled painter, thus he would have had an eye for beautiful things. Perhaps for this reason, Barclay in The Gospel of Luke calls Luke the “Lovely Gospel.” Luke is without a doubt a universal gospel addressed to all people. It portrays Jesus as the Blessed Sacrifice. Luke is a gospel that takes special note of the acts of women (an uncommon idea in that day), takes special note of the importance of praise to God, takes special caring note of sinners, outcasts and the poor and, for our purposes here takes special note, with the historian’s care, of the prayers of Jesus.

Luke demonstrates the importance of prayer in the life of Jesus: at His baptism (3:21); before doing battle with the Pharisees (5:16); before questioning the disciples as to His identity and the first prediction of His death (9:18); at the Transfiguration (9:29); and on the cross (23:46.) Interestingly enough Plummer points out in his commentary, that up until this point in the Gospel of Luke, the emphasis is on the prayer life of Jesus. After here, we begin to see the prayer life of the disciples emerge and come to full fruition in Acts, also of course written by Luke. Thus, we see the prayer continuum.

Today’s lesson takes the Model Prayer and holds it out to us as just that - a model. In summary, Jesus teaches his disciples and us, that indeed we should pray and “as you pray,” pray intentionally, pray persistently and pray expectantly.

In an Internet article entitled “Jesus on Prayer” by Dr. Donald T. Williams, in a sermon presented at Trinity Fellowship, Dr. Williams wonders why though prayer is so often urged on us, we have such difficulty in doing it. He suggests as an answer that perhaps we are viewing prayer wrongly.

Prayer at its best is a dialogue, a conversation between us and God. Did you hear that – between lowly us and the God of the universe? Though this is true, it is difficult, to keep this in mind. When we have a conversation with a friend, we get “feed-back.” Dr. Williams observes:
[t]hrough words, tone of voice, facial expression, and body language I have objective evidence of how my friend feels about what I have said--or whether she is even listening. With the invisible God there is none of that. To believe that prayer is more than a monologue requires a constant exercise of faith.

And failing that, we launch into the monologue of requests. I fear that sometimes such praying, though good is not the best because it seems that the focus has been on those things that we need or want to get from God and that can certainly be seen that as selfish praying.

Perhaps my impression of this type of prayer is influenced by my studying philosophy at the University of Montevallo with Prof. Hendrick Van Tuyll, a Dutch Baron and last of the old world philosophers. (We think Dr. Van Tuyvll actually studies with Immanuel Kant.) Dr. Van Tuyll was a minister in the Dutch Reform Church and taught that our prayers should always be prayers of recognition of God and praise and thanksgiving to Him. Dr. Van Tuyll believed that since God of course, already knew what we needed and wanted to give us what we needed and not what we wanted, then the thing to do is trust those things to God and not spend much time praying on it.

Well, be that as it may, perhaps we ought to spend the time on the totality of prayer, not for God’s benefit but for ours. I submit that we need to go through the exercise of prayer because in the honest, fervent prayer, God will speak to us (thus the dialogue) and set our thinking aright, thus adjusting our “wants” to our real “needs.” When we learn to distinguish those two things, we begin to have in us the “mind of Christ” about which Paul speaks in Philippians 2:5. Besides which, Jesus clearly and unabashedly teaches us to, as Paul would put it also in Philippians (4:6), “by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving, make your requests known unto God.”

Pray Intentionally (Luke 11:1-4).

Why did the disciples ask Jesus to teach them to pray? Were they not good Jews who prayed three times a day already? For starters, there was custom of the Jewish students that their Rabbi should give them a special prayer that distinguished his particular teaching. They were quite familiar with John the Baptist, indeed some may have previously been disciples of John’s. He taught them to pray. They follow that custom here.

If this passage comes, as Matthew has it, in the Sermon on the Mount, then they would have recognized in Jesus a man of great oratorical ability that to them equated to great spiritual power and knowledge. Secondly, they have recognized in Jesus a prayer life that was different from that to which they have become accustomed. As I stated earlier, these is no particular indication that the disciples were great men of prayer. It may be that they recognized this as a deficiency in their lives. So, in the Jesus-commanded child like open-mindedness, they say, “teach us to pray.”

Perhaps the over-riding thought here is not so much how you pray but THAT you pray. I would submit that as you pray in sincerity, God will lead you to “pray aright.” .

Bob Diffinbaugh from Dallas Theological Seminary, in his work on prayer points out that the prayer Jesus gives in vv. 2-4 is merely the skeleton of a prayer. We can then take this not as the “end-all, be-all on prayer, but the highlight of supplication. This is teaching on supplication. In other places we see Jesus giving examples of prayers of intercession. Perhaps, before we can intercede for others, though we must first understand what prayer is. Here Jesus teaches about the most basic form of prayer, that of supplication. But as we will see in the analysis of the prayer, Jesus has a method in His teaching. Jesus is saying “when you pray [make your requests known unto God, as Paul would say] do it this way.

This little piece of a prayer, then can be summarized as follows:

Our Father which art in Heaven. . .” Acknowledge the relationship that God is Abba-Father, and Father of us all, yet the “Heavenly Father” who exhibits all the attributes of God.

Hallowed [holy, blessed, set apart, different from everything else in the universe] IS (KJV uses “be” but not in the sense of some future hoped for event but in the sense of a present reality) Your name." Here we are recognizing that God is God and we aren’t. He is infinitely greater than we and that realization is the sine qua non to setting us on the path to right thinking and right “supplicating.”

"Your kingdom come, your will be done in Earth as it is in Heaven.” Request that His Kingdom [the “mind of Christ” will come [in your heart] and when it does He will begin to adjust your heart to conform it to His heart. When that happens, your will must be lost in His will and He will likewise adjust your way of thinking and viewing.

“Give us this day our daily bread.” Voice your requests to your Father. Here is where the listening comes in. As our will is lost in His, our wants and desires, the daily needs of life, will be matched to His desires for us and we will see His will done. We will receive that which He wants to give us and we will be satisfied with it because now it has become our desire as well.

“Forgive us our debts as we forgive our debtors.” Here enters the confession. As we are praying to be forgiven of these sins, we must confess them and then ask for forgiveness of sin, and

Lead us not into temptation.” Plead for protection from [falling into] temptation realizing that temptation is a wolf always at the door. That is to say that we should ever be mindful that temptations or “tests” will come, not that God “tempts” us to do evil, but that tests will come. The prayer here is that we pass the test. The way to pass the test is related to the foregoing parts of the prayer. Allow the “kingdom of God” in our hearts and recognize that we are weak and that we will only keep above sin by God’s provision to us .

But deliver us from [the Evil One.]" One commentator states that “we must be praying for insight into the evil that we, as good people with good intentions, might nonetheless do, and also for the strength to confess our sin, to repent, and to forgive others.” 1 Peter 4:7 tells us that Satan roams the Earth like a “raging lion seeking whom he may devour.” Our prayer here is that we will allow God to give us, as He wants to, a view of evil influence and then allow Him to keep us above that influence in our lives, something else He always wants to do.

Pray Persistently. (Luke 11:5-10) Jesus moves on to explain Himself further to make sure they get the point. He wants them to [and they, and we need to] pray persistently. Jesus follows the skeletal prayer with a parable, one that would be familiar to Jesus’ disciples. At certain times of the year because of the heat at mid-day, travelers often traveled at night. A friend has arrived in the middle of the night and the host needs food to feed him. Remember the time and the custom of the area. Since there were no Holiday Inns or even Motel 6s to “leave the lights on for us,” hospitality was a sacred duty. The host had to get some food – but the cupboard was bare, perhaps as bare as his poor Palestinian house with one room and an earthen floor covered with dried reeds or rushes.

The neighbor has bedded down for the night with all the family literally no more than arms length away. Perhaps some of the livestock was also in the house. To be disturbed was a major annoyance in that day and age. Nevertheless, the erstwhile host petulantly asks and asks for a handout until he achieves success and is satisfied. Jesus uses this parable a “story laid along side a truth” to illustrate the truth. In like fashion to many such other parables He uses the a fortiori argument (as we lawyers would say) arguing that though the thing requested is given by the annoyed neighbor, how much more so does our Father in Heaven give to those whom He loves. – if we persist in prayer.

Jesus follows the story with the famous quote, that to whoever [keeps on asking] it will be given – whoever [keeps on] looking will find and to whoever [keeps on] knocking, the door will be opened. The consistent clause here is demonstrated in the tense of the words written in the Greek [uttered by Jesus in Aramaic] which supplies the “keeps on” before the verb. There is a favorite children’s story that we used to read to our daughter, Amy when she was little, B. Shackman Company’s version of the antique original children’s bedtime story by Harry Frees, “Four Little Kittens,” whose chief characters are: Fuzz, Suzz, Buzz, Agamemnon. In the book, the kittens learn that “perseverance pays off.”

This concept, though does raise a couple of questions about prayer: if God is omniscient, and He is, then why must we make our wishes or supposed needs known to Him and secondly, if He is omniscient, and He is why must be persistently ask Him for things? Perhaps the answer lies in the mechanism of prayer as a means of keeping in touch with God constantly. Our need for things is a vehicle to keep us close to God. When we persistently ask, we “keep on” recognizing that without Him we have -and are- nothing. It’s not about the “stuff,” even good stuff, it’s about the relationship.

Pray Expectantly (Luke 11:11-13). Jesus continues the a fortiori argument by asking:

'if your children asked [Some manuscripts add for bread], do you give them a stone? Or if they ask for a fish, do you give them a snake instead? Or if they ask for an egg, do you give them a scorpion? Of course not! If you sinful people know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him."

Isn’t it presumptuous to “expect” that God is going to do what we tell Him to do? I think the answer is both “yes” and “no.” Note carefully what He says is the outcome. He promises that He will “give the Holy Spirit” to those that ask. Can we expect God to do what we expect Him to do” No, but can we expect God to do what He promises He will do? Absolutely. In fact, the expectation is a major portion of faith. T.W. Hunt teaches in his book, From Heaven’s View that the expectation that God will do what He says He will do is part and parcel of faith. First God says it, then you believe or give intellectual assent to it, then you must count it as done. That amounts to expectation. That must come before you take the final step of faith that is to “go out on the limb” and act in reliance on God doing what He says He will do.

Another question, why must we pray expectantly? The answer to this is related to the previous answer. Henry Blackaby would say that this is not about the stuff, it’s about the relationship. When we ask for things, we acknowledge to God that we are incomplete without Him and need Him. When we are able to turn over our expectations to Him, we take a big step in growing in that relationship. And that is the biggest blessing of all.